News

Stuiver: Tim Occhipinti – a developer shill and corruption apologist

Dear Horsey:
I am writing in response to the glowingly self-congratulatory
letter last week from Fourth Ward Councilman Timothy Occhipinti. Mr. Occhipinti
is always quick to itemize very real, laudable accomplishments, very few if any
are his for which to claim credit. I wish to offer a different perspective on
Mr. Occhipinti’s “service” to the ward.
For the past 16 months, our ward has endured what can only by the
most generously loose definition pass for representation by someone who has
proven to be a developer shill and corruption apologist.
The interests of our neighborhood’s people have languished under
Mr. Occhipinti’s tenure as our councilman in virtually every way, whether
through his attempted sabotage of the hospital that serves and employs so many Fourth
Ward residents, ridiculing the new flood-pump technology that has so palpably
alleviated a long-standing problem for our neighborhood, or his transparent and
sophomoric attempts to co-opt credit for Mayor Zimmer’s accomplishments to
which he made absolutely zero contribution, and in many ways actually served to
undermine by blocking funding.
But despite the low bar our councilman has set, I was stunned to
learn of his blatantly selling out the public trust.
On March 20, Mr. Occhipinti took the highly unorthodox step of
attempting to testify before the Zoning Board in a variance hearing – for a
developer who had gotten into hot water by illegally constructing a restaurant
facility on land the city has flagged to be part of a new southwest park.
The fact that Mr. Occhipinti either didn’t know or didn’t care
that a sitting councilman speaking before the Zoning Board on such a matter is
extremely problematic on multiple levels is shocking enough.
What makes the matter transcend his usual ineptitude, buffoonery
and wrong-headedness into what I can only describe as a form of legalized
corruption is the fact that the developer, Danny Tattoli, contributed $3,500 to
Mr. Occhipinti’s election campaigns.
This apparent quid-pro-quo arrangement is the ultimate betrayal of
the neighborhood residents Mr. Occhipinti purports to represent. He ran for
council promising to be an “independent voice” for our ward, including a
commitment to push for a southwest park. Instead, he turned around and took
large sums from a developer who wanted to build where the park is supposed to
go, then sought to insert himself into the Zoning Board process for granting
his developer friend the variances needed to retroactively justify construction
that he’d already illegally completed. The appearance of impropriety is
unmistakable and undeniable, not to mention the rank hypocrisy, given Mr.
Occhipinti’s feigned outrage at the alleged appearance of such conflicts when
it has suited him politically.
Mr. Occhipinti has proven himself to be what many of us always
suspected – a bought-and-paid-for friend of developers, championing not the
southwest park he promised, but rather the legal loopholes that allow this kind
of betrayal to undermine the public interest at every turn.
Sincerely,
Jake Stuiver
Fourth Ward Resident

Fourth ward resident Jake Stuiver led the protest against Councilman Michael Russo last spring.
His letter decrying Tim Occhipinti’s “performance” on the council also appears in the weekend paper.



The accuracy of Stuiver’s letter has scored the typical baseless charges at: 
http://hudsonreporter.com/view/full_story/18163710/article-Who-does-Councilman-Occhipinti-really-represent-?instance=hoboken_letters_story_left_column

Leave a Reply